911 THE NEW PEARL HARBOR THE ENTIRE BOOK FOR DOWNLOAD.

A must-read for all who want to get past the conspiracy of silence and mystification that surrounds 9/11.

A very interesting book.

However, David Ray Griffin buys into the "Pentagon was hit by a missile theory," which has been advanced by the 911 false opposition. That a missile did not hit the Pentagon is obvious. For,

1) if the missile had detonated upon hitting the outside, brick-fill wall of the Pentagon, then the explosion would have likely leveled a large section of this wall. This did not happen. In any case, it would not produce the 120 foot wide, by 10-20 foot high, plane shaped hole, that was observed. Also, there would be nothing left of the missile, but small pieces of shrapnel, each without enough momentum to penetrate much further into the building, let alone penetrate a couple of hundred feet further (through E-ring, D-ring and C-ring) and punch a 12 foot wide circular hole in the far wall of C-ring.

2) if it did not detonate on hitting the wall, then it would have left a small, near circular hole, some 2 foot wide. This did not happen either.

I think it is clear that an aircraft did hit the Pentagon, however, for some strange reason, that aircraft was not a Boeing 757. Why not just use a Boeing 757? Answering this question could quite possibly break 911 wide open.

Download your copy (prepublication edition) from

http://vancouver.indymedia.org/news/2004/06/141355.php

Read it, then go out a purchase the book.

From globalresearch.ca.myforums.net