Home > Army Insider Blows the Whistle on Human Rights Abuses at Guantánamo

Army Insider Blows the Whistle on Human Rights Abuses at Guantánamo

by Open-Publishing - Sunday 8 May 2005
8 comments

International Prison Attack-Terrorism USA

Soldier lifts lid on Camp Delta

For the first time, an army insider blows the whistle on human rights abuses at Guantánamo

Paul Harris in New York
Sunday May 8, 2005
The Observer

An American soldier has revealed shocking new details of abuse and sexual torture of prisoners at Guantánamo Bay in the first high-profile whistleblowing account to emerge from inside the top-secret base.

Erik Saar, an Arabic speaker who was a translator in interrogation sessions, has produced a searing first-hand account of working at Guantánamo. It will prove a damaging blow to a White House still struggling to recover from the abuse scandal at Abu Ghraib jail in Iraq.

In an exclusive interview, Saar told The Observer that prisoners were physically assaulted by ’snatch squads’ and subjected to sexual interrogation techniques and that the Geneva Conventions were deliberately ignored by the US military.

He also said that soldiers staged fake interrogations to impress visiting administration and military officials. Saar believes that the great majority of prisoners at Guantánamo have no terrorist links and little worthwhile intelligence information has emerged from the base despite its prominent role in America’s war on terror.

Saar paints a picture of a base where interrogations of often innocent prisoners have spiralled out of control, doing massive damage to America’s image in the Muslim world.

Saar said events at Guantánamo were a disaster for US foreign policy. ’We are trying to promote democracy worldwide. I don’t see how you can do that and run a place like Guantánamo Bay. This is now a rallying cry to the Muslim world,’ he said.

Saar arrived at Guantánamo Bay in December 2002, and worked there until June 2003. He first worked as a translator in the prisoners’ cages. He was then transferred to the interrogation teams, acting as a translator.

Saar’s book, Inside the Wire, provides the first fully detailed look inside Guantánamo Bay’s role as a prison for detainees the White House has insisted are the ’worst of the worst’ among Islamic militants. His tale describes his gradual disillusionment, from arriving as a soldier keen to do his duty to eventually leaving believing the regime to be a breach of human rights and a disaster for the war on terror.

Among the most shocking abuses Saar recalls is the use of sex in interrogation sessions. Some female interrogators stripped down to their underwear and rubbed themselves against their prisoners. Pornographic magazines and videos were also used as rewards for confessing.

In one session a female interrogator took off some of her clothes and smeared fake blood on a prisoner after telling him she was menstruating. ’That’s a big deal. It is a major insult to one of the world’s biggest religions where we are trying to win hearts and minds,’ Saar said.

Saar also describes the ’snatch teams’, known as the Initial Reaction Force (IRF), who remove unco-operative prisoners from their cells. He describes one such snatch where a prisoner’s arm was broken. In a training session for an IRF team, one US soldier posing as a prisoner was beaten so badly that he suffered brain damage. It is believed the IRF team had not been told the ’detainee’ was a soldier.

Staff at Guantánamo also faked interrogations for visiting senior officials. Prisoners who had already been interrogated were sat down behind one-way mirrors and asked old questions while the visiting officials watched.

Saar also describes the effects prolonged confinement had on many of the prisoners. He details bloody suicide attempts and serious mental illnesses. One detainee slashed his wrists with razors and wrote in blood on a wall: ’I committed suicide because of the brutality of my oppressors.’

Saar details a meeting with an army lawyer where linguists, interrogators and intelligence workers at the base were told the Geneva Conventions did not apply to their work as the detainees could not be considered normal prisoners of war. At the end of the meeting the group was told: ’We still intend to treat the detainees humanely, but our purpose is to get any actionable intelligence we can and quickly.’

But Saar said that many, if not most, of the detainees were rarely interrogated at all after their initial arrival. They just sat listlessly in their cells for months on end. He believes that many of them were either simple footsoldiers caught up in the war in Afghanistan or elsewhere, or innocent men sold out to the Americans by local enemies settling a grudge or looking to collect reward money.

Saar accepts that some genuine terrorists have been held at Guantánamo. ’There are individuals there who I hope will never be set free,’ he said, but he contends that they are in the minority. ’Overall, it is counter-productive,’ he said.

Saar was an enthusiastic supporter of George Bush in the 2000 elections but he has changed his world view after being exposed to Guantánamo Bay. ’I believe in America and American troops,’ he said, ’but it has drastically changed my world view and my politics.’

Saar left the army and has become a hate figure for some right-wing groups which say he and his book are unpatriotic. But Saar believes exposing the abuses of Guantánamo will lessen the damage done to America’s reputation in the long run. ’The camp is a mistake. It does not need to be that way. There should be a better way, more in line with American morals,’ he said.

http://observer.guardian.co.uk/international/story/0,6903,1479040,00.html

Forum posts

  • beautiful American society, culutre and people.
    keep spreading you wonderfull american culture USA, the rest of the world is crying out to be as wondefull as you guys. show us the way to a better human society
    *sarcasm off*

  • Mr. Reagan at the Berlin Wall once shouted: Mr. Gorbachew tear down this wall!

    Now is the time for the world society to shout: America tear down the Concentration Camp of Guantanamo Bay.

    Buchenwald
    Ausschwitz
    Vietnam
    Chile
    Iraq (Fallujah)
    Abu Gharib
    Guantanamo Bay

    These are the infamous places of humanity.

    • Nothing will be done. The US have taken control of most of the world. The countries that form part of the Coalition of the Willing are scared not to be allies of the US. Our civilised countries condone the use of torture and slaughtering of innocent people. The pretend they don’t - but they continually allow it to happen.

      Do we really expect that the Iraqis will stop fighting and give into US policy. No - of course, we’ve treated them as nothing, why wouldn’t they hate us for what we have done to them.

  • At least one prisoner released from Guantanamo has been picked up again in Afghanistan, where he was trying to kill Americans again.

    One prisoner at Guantanamo made a guard seriously ill by jamming his own shit under his fingernails, then clawing at the guard.

    Before the Taliban fell, they captured one American, a Navy SEAL who fell out of a helicopter. They promptly dragged him into the rocks and shot him in the face. To the extent the Americans do not respond in kind, they are showing restraint.

    I don’t care a whole hell of a lot what happens to the prisoners at Guantanamo, and neither should you.

    • Many of the people detained at Guantanamo have been held for 2-3 years without being charged with a crime. Maybe you should be grabbed up off of the street or dragged out of your home late at night and shipped off to one of those dog cages without any charges or any idea of how long you will be there, maybe torture you until you confess to any accusations. That would be just and fair seeing how you have no caring for other human beings or life itself.

    • You are exactly wrong about the rules and customs of warfare. Charging a combatant with a crime would be a gross violation of the Geneva Conventions. The whole point is that captured enemy combatants are not criminals, they are held for the purpose of taking them out of the war until the end of hostilities.

      The fact that this particular enemy is deliberately hiding among the civilian population is problematic. This kind of hiding is also against the rules and customs of war, the idea being that it increases the chances that civilians will be killed or captured by mistake. Our forces have to do the best they can with a bad situation—created by the enemy.

  • the media seems to forget that its not only people who muslim that find this horific and distubing

    • No, no, we have to be especially sensitive to the feelings of muslims. They are ALWAYS so sensitive of the feelings of Westerners (Theo Van Gogh, Spanish commuters, Aussies out for a night out in Bali, New Yorkers starting their day in Manhattan).