Hamdan vrs Rumsfeld: A REMINDER TO THE SUPREME COURT! AND FEDERAL JUDGES

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/pro... with all of busheys marbles; (for unitary dictatorial unconstitutional internationally illegal and immoral assumptions that he can push his misgided agenda around the world and convince complicit judges to endorse this psychotic agenda) riding on the Hamdan vrs rumsfeld case up before the United States Suprem Court, a gentle reminder that everything Hitler and his compliant judges deemed legal in Germany were in fact rendered to justice at the international Nuremberg Trials. FAIR WARNING has bin issued.
Trying Body: Military Tribunal III
Arraignment Date: Feb. 17, 1947
Trial Opened: March 5, 1947
Summations Concluded: October 18, 1947
Verdicts Returned: Dec. 3 and 4, 1947

Verdict: Ten of the sixteen defendants convicted, four acquitted, one died before verdict, one mistrial due to serious illness during trial.

Sentence: Four defendants sentenced to life, the other six convicted defendants sentenced to terms ranging from five to ten years.
DR. LOTHAR KREYSSIG :LAW’S HEROES _ I see another hero judge on the other side of the Atlantic, in Nazi Germany. Almost alone among the judges of the Third Reich, he stubbornly clings to the notion that justice matters more than career advancement. His name is Dr. Lothar Kreyssig, a judge at the Court of Guardianship in the town of Brandenburg, on the Havel River.
Since his appointment in 1928, Kreyssig’s superiors considered him to be a good judge—until he began a series of minor insubordinations such as slipping out of a ceremony in his court when a bust of Hitler was unveiled, publicly protesting the suspension of three judges who failed to follow the interpretation of "Aryan laws" favored by Nazi authorities, and referring to Nazi church policies as "injustice masquerading in the form of law."
http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/pro... READ ABOUT THE NUREMBERG "JUSTICE TRIAL"

NURMEBERG TRIALS: MAIN PAGE

http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/pro... http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/pro... In his book, Hitler’s Justice: The Courts of the Third Reich, Ingo Muller writes of the courageous judge of Brandenburg: "No matter how hard one searches for stout-hearted men among the judges of the Third Reich, for judges who refused to serve the regime from the bench, there remains a grand total of one: Dr. Lothar Kreyssig."

_ German Justices who enabled Hitler inhumane undemocratic laws legal on trial at Nuremberg.

Benedict Wein, a priest, testifies for the prosecution

Tribunal III hears witness in the Justice Trial http://www.law.umkc.edu/faculty/pro... Justice Jackson’s Opening Statement for the Prosecution the ramifications from this case of The case is Hamdan v. Rumsfeld , No. 05-184. A decision is expected by July.

are enormous in scope not only to the chauffeur of Saddam Hussein, Mr. Hamdan but to every citizen of the world.with many intelligence officials worldwide thinking that israeli election date march 28 2006 being the nest false flag opertion of terror against amerikkka, our time could be near for seeing their attempt to enforce their martial law that they have installed if needed to try and enforce, i hope you all remember how the amerikkkan gestapo DHS handled narlins ,forced decisions are never right, we were created to make decisions right or wrong, it would be a travesty if these 8 supreme court justices who are eligible to hear this case, and mr roberts who has already made his decision to enable bushey and cheneys unconstitutional powers granted to defend the very terror they are responsible for creating. I hope they take this gentle FAIR WARNING REMINDER ,and judge fairly on all the evidence available, for all of our sakes.