Home > Is Gustav Katrina the Second?
Is Gustav Katrina the Second?
Scott Stevens
« The Coming Weather Wars Documentary
Aug 30th 2008ScottIn the news
The similarities, at least at this early stage of Gustav’s development, aren’t lost on the Mainstream media either.
After the devastation of Katrina was allowed to happen to New Orleans with this damage occurring mainly after the curious explosive ‘failure’ of the levies, I stated in several interviews that I believed that New Orleans should NOT be rebuilt. Only the original New Orleans, the Crescent City should be attended to. The remainder of the city, wisdom would soon show, should to be left alone and returned to Nature. We didn’t and don’t belong there. That land, barley above water, would be better off used as a buffer and as wetlands for future storm protection.
I remain profoundly surprised at how slow the rebuilding has been. Pitiful is a fair enough verb to describe the return of New Orleans to its former glory.
If whomever is running the global weather operations wanted to make a point, an example of the abject failures of the Bush Administration, look for Gustav’s landfall Tuesday morning 2 September 2008 within 75 miles of Katrina’s landfall—likely skewed a bit to the west of Katrina’s landfall. Worst care senario is that the storm turns westward just prior to landfall scouring the Gulf Coast from the mouth of the Mississippi River all the way to Huston Texas. Ouch!
As a side note I hope to have one of my co-researchers at the point of land fall to gather up magnetic field measurements generated by this massive electric motor called Gustav. I’m not yet sure whether he is stupid or brave to head into this historic weather event.
The brand new New Orleans Levee system is worse off now than it was before the Army Corps of Engineers rebuilt the 220 miles of levees. It leaks… If it’s leaking on a sunny May day God help those that are depending on them to keep Gulf waters at bay during a Cat 2 storm or greater. The pumps just won’t be able to keep up!
My opinion about the 2008 hurricane season has been that there is too much money to be made from oil and natural gas at today’s prices to want to shut in much online production. But damage results in a spike in prices from say $115 to $150/barrel (a 25% gain) and 25% of production is shut in due to extensive long lasting damage to oil infrastructure, the game is then a wash, from the oil producers stand point. However, all of OPEC’s global production continues onward, so OPEC earns 25% more on their Middle Eastern or South American production so producers clean up nicely.
I still get emails asking me whether or not certain weather disasters/events are manipulated. Let me be clear, very clear about this… It is my opinion, that from my observations of these many many worldwide weather events, about 92-96 pct of the weather over North America, Europe, and Australia are persistently being manipulated. That is, the vast majority of all weather these days is tainted by these technologies. The bigger the weather event the greater the intention has been set in motion to make it a big event! Hurricanes are no longer by-products of a natural process.
This means that ALL of these big weather disasters are created and are allowed, if not encouraged, to happen. This will be the case until the masses of “useless eaters” as Henry Kissinger called us, wake up and begin to have a real influence on the matters of the world.
Next up, Hanna…