Home > Saudi black op team behind Damascus chem weapons attack – diplomatic sources

Saudi black op team behind Damascus chem weapons attack – diplomatic sources

by Open-Publishing - Saturday 5 October 2013

The August chemical weapons attack in the Syrian capital’s suburbs was done by a Saudi Arabian black operations team, Russian diplomatic sources have told a Russian news agency.

“Based on data from a number of sources a picture can be
pieced together. The criminal provocation in Eastern Ghouta was
done by a black op team that the Saudi’s sent through Jordan and
which acted with support of the Liwa Al-Islam group,”
a
source in the diplomatic circles told Interfax.

The attack and its consequences had a huge impact on the Syrian
situation, another source said.

“Syrians of various political views, including some opposition
fighters, are seeking to inform diplomats and members of
international organizations working in Syria what they know about
the crime and the forces which inspired it,”
he told the
agency.

Liwa Al-Islam is an Islamist armed group operating near Damascus
headed by the son of a Saudi-based Salafi cleric. The group
claimed responsibility for the bombing of a secret governmental
meeting in Damascus in July 2012 that killed a number of top
Syrian officials, including Defense Minister Dawoud Rajiha, his
deputy Asef Shawkat, and Assistant Vice President Hassan
Turkmani.

The allegations mirror a number of earlier reports, which pointed
to Saudi Arabia as the mastermind behind the sarin gas attack,
which almost led to US military action against Syrian government.
Proponents of this scenario say intelligence services in Riyadh
needed a false flag operation to provoke an American attack in
Syria, which would tip the balance in favor of the armed
opposition supported by Saudi Arabia.

While the majority of Western countries say they are certain that
the Syrian government carries the blame for the attack, Damascus
maintains that the rebel forces must be behind it. Russia shares
this conviction too, calling the incident a provocation.

United Nations vehicles are seen leaving the hotel in Damascus (AFP Photo / Louai Beshara)

United Nations vehicles are seen leaving the hotel in Damascus (AFP Photo / Louai Beshara)

Back in March US President Barack Obama said the use of chemical
weapons would be a ‘red line’ for the Syrian government, crossing
which would prompt America’s intervention into the bloody Syrian
conflict. After the August attack, which the US believes has
claimed some 1,400 lives, the president was called on his words
by many supporters of the Syrian opposition both at home and
outside of the US.

Earlier a UN report concluded that nerve gas had indeed been used
“on a large scale” in August. However, the consistency of
the findings is under question.

According to the report, none of the environmental samples the UN
collected in Western Ghouta tested positive for Sarin, while
biomedical samples, taken from affected people, all tested
positive.

RT’s Worlds Apart host Oksana Boyko has spoken to Angela Kane, UN
high representative for disarmament affairs, who has just
returned from Damascus.

“If you read the report, the report comes out and says sarin
was used. It is also a matter that maybe in the environmental
samples they took there was no sarin found, but that does not
mean that sarin was not used,”
Kane told Worlds Apart. “It
was there in the human samples. If they had more time to go
around they would have found different samples. It was a limited
collection that they did, but the collection was conclusive. I
think, it was very comprehensive, therefore, we shared all of
those samples with the Syrian government.”


At the same time, there have been concerns voiced that witnesses
the UN team spoke to were brought by the opposition from
different regions and did not live in Western Ghouta.

“I think it is not possible to say ‘We brought them all from a
different area.’ To my mind that is inconceivable. You can come
up with the theory, but this does not mean the theory is
correct,”
Kane said. 

When asked if the UN team had requested examining dead bodies to
take more samples, Kane said they had not, because “there was
no need to exhume dead bodies”
as victims’ accounts “are
much more powerful.”


“Dead body can’t tell you anything. The dead body can’t tell
how the person dies, how the person was affected, how the person
suffered. A living person can tell you that,”
 Kane
said.

After the UN team left Syria on Monday, Organization for the
Prohibition of Chemical Weapons (OPCW) experts arrived in the
country. They are currently making preparations for the
disarmament.

The OPCW team will start conducting tests on October 7.

http://rt.com/news/syria-sarin-saudi-provocation-736/