Le site Bellaciao: coloré, multiple, ou le meilleur cotoie fort heureusement le pire, mélangé, bizarre, picabien et dadaîste, explorant toutes sortes de registres et de régimes rhétoriques, drole et polémiqueur, surréaliste: rencontre d'un parapluie et d'une machine à coudre sur une table de dissection, têtes de Lénine sur le clavier d'un piano Steinway ou Bosendorfer...
FR
ES
Senal en Vivo
VIDEO
RADIO
FRIENDS SITES
with Bellaciao
Bellaciao hosted by
To rebel is right, to disobey is a duty, to act is necessary !
Bellaciao  mobile version   |   Home  |   About us   |   Donation  |   Links  |   Contact  |   Search
A Movement of Movements: Is Another World Really Possible?

by : V. SRIDHAR
Monday October 25, 2004 - 01:46
1 comment

Edited by Tom Mertes, Verso (London, New York), 2004; price $19/£13

By V. SRIDHAR

The annual celebration of the resistance to globalisation, in particular the dominant neoliberal version, has within the space of a few years acquired significance as a rallying point for people around the world. Diehard advocates of neoliberal globalisation like to portray "globalisation’s discontents" as Luddites, without a sense of the unfolding process of globalisation, which is portrayed as being not only unique in the history of humankind but also irreversible.

Positing the issue thus serves several purposes. For one, the arguments are authoritarian in the sense that it leaves very little scope for dialogue with dissenters of globalisation defined in a neoliberal framework. Thus, defenders of this kind of globalisation are seen as leaving very little room for democratic institutions to accept or reject the dominant notions of the markets, their impact on societies and the resulting social upheaval in societies across the world.

About a decade ago, the resistance to this version of globalisation was weak, especially when neoliberalism, seen with the benefit of hindsight, had reached its pinnacle of glory. But things have changed so much so that even those who had been with "them", such as the Nobel Prize winner Joseph Stiglitz, have broken ranks, unable to withstand the suffocating confines of a dominant version that refuses to allow any dissent at all. More importantly, the rising tide of protests across the world has brought organisations across the world together. There is growing awareness that a "movement of movements" is a historic necessity. In fact, the very genesis of the World Social Forum (WSF) in 2001 as a counter to the World Economic Forum (WEF) reflects a realisation that neoliberalism on a globalscale needs to be countered by a world-scale resistance to the process. Simply put, the realisation is this: globalisation as a process sets to impose on nations and peoples across the world a set of policies that integrate their markets. This process leaves little room for countries to remain sovereign, particularly in terms of preserving the sovereign will of their peoples. Therefore, there is an urgent need to build a coalition of resistance movements that is truly global in character.

Released to coincide with the fourth edition of the WSF in Mumbai, the book is a collection of essays, articles and interviews, many of which were published earlier in New Left Review. The book is divided into three parts. In the first part are presentations by voices from the South. Among these are an interview of Subcommandante Marcos, the leader of the movement of the Zapatistas in the Chiapas in Mexico. There is also an interview of Joao Pedro Stedile, national committee member of the Brazilian MST (Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra, composed of landless rural workers). The MST has not provided the mass base for the government of President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva but also laid the basis for organising the WSF, all of which (except WSF 2004) were held at Porto Alegre in the State of Rio Grande do Sul, where the MST has built a formidable base since the late 1970s. Among other southern voices are those of Walden Bello, a prominent speaker at WSF meets ever since the famous anti-Davos protest by activists from around the world at Davos in 1999.

The second part of the book belongs to Northern voices; among them is an interview with Jose Bove, prominent farmer-activist from France, who was an active participant at the WSF in Mumbai. They bring fresh insights into the way the anti-globalisation movement has grown in the North, particularly after the historic protests against the World Trade Organisation (WTO) Ministerial meeting at Seattle in 2001.

The last part of the book, Analytics, deals with thematic presentations on theoretical issues that are relevant to building a global movement against neoliberal globalisation. The omission of the militaristic mobilisation of the United States, particularly since September 2001, and its impact on people’s movements across the world appears to be glaring. The wider theme of imperialism and its connection to the neoliberal agenda, which has always engaged the attention of critics of globalisation, is thus missed completely in the volume. The fact that the U.S.-led war on Iraq engaged the attention of activists assembled in Mumbai highlights the lacuna.

Although the interview of Subcommandante Marcos (believed to be Rafael Guillen) was conducted by Gabriel Garcia Marquez and was first published in March 2001 in Revista Cambio, a Bagota-based journal, and later in English in New Left Review a few months later, it remains relevant. Subcommandante Marcos explains, for instance, the limitations of a social movement that is confined in geographical space and by ethnicity. Marcos points out the limitations of an armed resistance that fails to build a democratic practice for itself. The world or, societies for that matter, he observes, "cannot be reconstructed on the basis of a quarrel of who will impose their hegemony on society". He also remarks that respect and tolerance among different kinds of people is a prerequisite for building a more egalitarian social order. With a touch of irony, coming as it does from a leader of a guerrilla movement, Marcos points out that respect and tolerance had been lacking in the "politico-military organisations of the 1960s and 1970s".

In his wide-ranging response, Stedile points out that the historic evolution of the MST was not a spontaneous outburst by the poor and dispossessed. The distribution of land in Brazil, incidentally, is among the most unequal in the world. According to the British Broadcasting Corporation, the top 20 per cent of landowners hold 90 per cent of all farm land; and the poorest 40 per cent of the peasantry owns just 1 per cent of the land. Stedile points out that the movement of the landless started in 1978 and spread throughout the southern, northern and northeastern Brazil. This was also the time that Brazil’s industrialisation programme, which was based much like India’s industrial development programme after Independence on import substitution through the development of a strong national industrial base, was being rolled back under pressure from the U.S. Several aspects of Stedile’s articulation of the story of struggle and success in Brazil have relevance. For one, they provide an idea of what it means for ordinary people to rise up and win at a time when neoliberalism gained ascendancy. But more importantly, Stedile also debunks several notions about what the anti-globalisation movement ought to be if it is ever to make another world possible.

Stedile points out that none of the movements in Brazil was spontaneous. All of them were clearly planned and organised by local activists. Stedile traces the "genesis" of the MST to the period between 1978, when urban Brazil erupted in anger against the dictatorship in the country, and 1983. The heart of the MST movement was in the way it addressed the land hunger among the peasantry. Realising that the mobilisation of the greatest numbers provided the only security against a military dictatorship, the movement insisted that peasants would march together, with their belongings and with families including women and children, literally on the land to take possession. Stedile points out that although the movement suffered tragic losses in the course of its struggle, it also registered spectacular victories. The organisational tactics of the MST played a crucial part in its success. For instance, membership of the MST has never been formal. There are no forms to be filled and no membership cards. All that a peasant has to do, if he or she wishes to join the MST is to take part in a land occupation struggle. The mobilisation strategy, of gathering entire families, has also played a role in ensuring the participation of women in the mass movement for land reform. However, from the beginning the MST also realised that although the land question had the potential of galvanising the peasants, it was only one battle on the road ahead. "We knew it changed nothing just to bring a few families, move onto unused land and think that was the end."

Another important tactic of the MST is that despite its close association with the Workers’ Party, now leading the coalition government in Brazil, it has maintained its independence. The MST, in fact, organised a 180-km march in November 2003 demanding that the government settle one million landless families over the next four years. Although the government headed by Lula has maintained a close relationship with the MST, the movement has always insisted on maintaining its autonomy from political parties. The MST also developed a successful mass base by articulating a programme for agrarian reform in all of Brazil instead of confining itself to the demand for land by local communities. Moreover, it developed an organisational network by using its base in the south of the country to train cadres across the country. Stedile observes that the experience of political parties in Latin America had shown the MST that "whenever a mass movement is subordinated to a political party, it was weakened by the effects of inner-party splits and factional battles".

Stedile, using the traditional language of the Left, which many from even among its constituents are shy to use nowadays, observes that the MST was aware that if farmers do not organise themselves, do not fight for more than just a piece of land, they would never reach a wider class consciousness. Without this, he points out, they will not be able to deal with the "underlying problems because land in itself does not free the farmer from exploitation".

Commenting on the Zapatista movement, Stedile points out that one of its weaknesses has been its inability, unlike the MST in Brazil, to widen its social base, growing from a movement of indigenous people demanding autonomy into a broader social force. "They," he remarks, "have accepted the terms of fighting for a specific ethnicity, within a particular territory - whereas ours is a farmers’ movement that has been transformed and politicised as a result of the advance of capitalism." He points out that if the Brazilian farmers had been able to organise themselves in the 1930s just as well as they have done in recent years, that would have still remained a mere movement for agrarian reform given the objective conditions of underdeveloped capitalism in Brazil at that time.

AT one level the WSF is a festival of the resistance movements, a spectacle in itself. As a gathering of representatives of victims of neoliberal globalisation it is also marked by a stunning array of plural viewpoints, a cacophony of voices if one pays heed to the critics or the cynics. But anti-globalisation activists insist that this is as it should be. A plurality of voices and viewpoints, especially about evolving a new order that is not based on policies that trample on peoples’ aspirations, according to them, stands in direct contrast to the one-size-fits all approach that the Washington Consensus has come to mean. Indeed, Stiglitz, speaking recently in Delhi, drew a huge turnout which indicated that the constituency of the discontented has been expanding. More people, it appears, are now not only willing but wanting to hear more about alternatives to the dominant interpretation of neoliberalism. This is not surprising that it is by now evident that the fruits of globalisation are being delivered to a narrow (and rapidly) narrowing constituency.

Although the WSF process has gained in strength, it has also attracted friendly fire from those who think that the spectacle is dominating to the point that serious issues of how to build a wider resistance to the dominant version of globalisation is to be built are relegated to the background. In particular, there has been muted criticism, particularly from Left participants, that a more cohesive agenda needs to be evolved if the WSF is truly to evolve into an alternative vision for the world. Although plurality has its virtues, particularly for democratic practice, a mere celebration of diversity is obviously inadequate.

http://www.flonnet.com/fl2103/stori...



Leave a comment
Print this article


Commentaires de l'article
 

> A Movement of Movements: Is Another World Really Possible?
Monday October 25 - 04:22 - Posted by 71c3f09e3b6b1621...

I’ve put together a solution that is centered around HAVING OPTIONS. The COOPS, for example, are the big missing element in the capitalist world for the most part. In capitalism, you either are at the top of the food chain or at the bottom, and that sounds like a jungle to me. And so I say we must come out of the jungle...

A ROAD TO FREEDOM (UNLIKE RUSSIA’S)

Why not build a new system? That offers PROSPERITY, SOCIAL JUSTICE and FREEDOM; that discards the defects of both Communism and Capitalism; and that places the system at the service of the human being, and not the other way around. Why not HUMANISM?

Naturally, education and health care should be the maximum priorities; they should be free -or affordable, in the case of higher education- and accessible to all. Education should emphasize the learning of English -or Esperanto, if we all ever agree on it- and literacy... in computers. Likewise, culture and sports should receive special attention (for example, adopting the affordable child-care centers; in general, we would have much to learn from the Scandinavian model). A MIXED MODEL, that includes competition and cooperation, would create a healthy competition, and it would allow to satisfy the material and human needs of all. (In this way, the cooperative enterprises would be forced to become more efficient, while capitalist enterprises would be forced to become more humane; we would have much to learn from the Israeli kibbutz [non-profit cooperatives]; and from the industrial cooperatives of Mondragon, in the Basque Country [a "workers capitalism"].)

more...

http://webspawner.com/users/donquijote1







Public Apology to Women of the World from The American Republic (Hypatia of Alex
Monday 31 - 15:21
by Willam Morgan
YES, THERE WILL BE ELECTION FRAUD, AND ON A GRAND SCALE
Sunday 23 - 18:32
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Hillary Clinton will be first female President 2017
Monday 10 - 17:21
by Willam Morgan
Police Shootings: Law, Policy, and Accountability
Thursday 6 - 14:22
by William John Cox
AMERICA DESERVES BETTER, BUT EVEN MORE IMPORTANTLY, THE WORLD DESERVES BETTER
Thursday 29 - 18:02
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Back to School for Fascist Dupont-Aignan
Thursday 15 - 11:32
by Nouveau Comité de Vigilance des Intellectuels Antifascistes
The Presidency: Character Matters
Friday 9 - 15:06
by William John Cox
WHY HILLARY IS THE PERFECT PERSON TO SECURE OBAMA’S LEGACY
Tuesday 30 - 18:08
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Remake of Ben Hur in 2020 planned by new motion picture studio
Friday 26 - 15:50
by Wallace
THE CASE FOR DONALD TRUMP
Monday 22 - 19:32
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
THE CONSTITUTION OF THE UNITED STATES IS DEAD
Thursday 11 - 06:42
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
DONALD TRUMP AND THE GENIUS OF IDIOCY
Friday 5 - 00:47
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
FOOLING MOST OF THE PEOPLE MOST OF THE TIME IS WHAT AMERICAN POLITICS ARE ABOUT,
Friday 29 - 18:13
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
A message of your fellow striking workers from France
Tuesday 12 - 20:49
by Info’Com-CGT
The Right to Vote, Effectively
Friday 8 - 22:20
by William John Cox
Fourth of July Lies
Sunday 3 - 19:41
by June C. Terpstra
Who Should Make Political Policy, the People or the Politicians?
Friday 24 - 15:14
by William John Cox
Hollow Women of the Hegemon Part II: Atrocity Enabling Harpies
Tuesday 21 - 18:49
by Dr. June Terpstra
The American Republic Manifestum book is being made into a Movie
Saturday 11 - 15:54
by William Morgan
Write-in Voting and Political Protest
Wednesday 1 - 15:05
by William John Cox
Yves Bouvier art battle plays out in online and social media arena
Tuesday 31 - 21:12
by Dean Bagley
Damaged Candidate Clinton Can’t Call Out Trump
Friday 27 - 13:53
by Daniel Patrick Welch
PLEDGE OF THE NEW REPUBLICAN PARTY
Tuesday 24 - 21:53
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
LET TEXAS SECEDE
Thursday 19 - 00:53
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
LAS TRES ERRES A LA ENÉSIMA POTENCIA.-
Monday 16 - 15:35
by FREDDY SUBDIAGA
DEMAGOGIA POPULISTA...
Monday 16 - 15:26
by FREDDY SUBDIAGA
Oligarchs Won’t Let You Vote Their Wars Away
Wednesday 11 - 20:24
by Daniel Patrick Welch
AN AMERICAN ORIGINAL: JOHN KERRY - FROM HIS REMARKABLE RECENT COMMENCEMENT ADDR
Monday 9 - 20:40
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
Donald Trump and Hillary Clinton support the American Republic Manifestum
Monday 9 - 16:37
by William Morgan
Transformation: A Student-Led Mass Political Movement
Monday 25 - 19:28
by William John Cox
Algerian Feminists react to ’Hijab Day’ in Paris 2016
Monday 25 - 01:13
THE ILLUSION OF RIGHTS
Friday 22 - 18:45
by JOHN CHUCKMAN
US is real superpredator pretending to be victim
Monday 18 - 22:23
by Daniel Patrick Welch
Gaiacomm International has accidently created a fusion reaction/ignition.
Sunday 17 - 17:01
by William Morgan
Clinton’s Campaign Continues to Highlight Horrible Hillary
Saturday 9 - 00:57
by Daniel Patrick Welch
Armoiries racistes à Harvard : Plaidoyer pour la réflexion socio-historique
Thursday 7 - 18:56
by Samuel Beaudoin Guzzo
THANK YOU MISSISSIPPI FOR YOUR HATE
Wednesday 6 - 02:02
by David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
The PKK in Iraq: “We are ready to fight ISIS everywhere in the world”
Monday 4 - 14:33
by InfoAut
Clinton Crashes and Burns, Sanders Will Win (But hold off on the applause)
Friday 1 - 22:33
by Daniel Patrick Welch
Confirming Supreme Court Justices and Electing Presidents
Friday 1 - 20:59
by William John Cox

home | webmaster



Follow-up of the site's activity
RSS Bellaciao En


rss FR / rss IT / rss ES



Bellaciao hosted by DRI

Organize, agitate, educate, must be our war cry. Susan B. Anthony
Facebook Twitter Google+
DAZIBAO
I, European citizen, won’t let refugees be rejected in my name
Thursday 10 March
©Olivier Jobard/Myop I, European citizen, won’t let refugees be rejected in my name THE RIGHT TO ASYLUM IS A RIGHT In the phrase « right to asylum », every word matters. Under the law, every person who is persecuted because of his or her political opinions or because of his or her identity, every person that is endangered by violence, war or misery has a RIGHT to seek asylum in another country The aim of this petition is to collect (...)
read more...
Neo-Nazis and far-right protesters in Ukraine 3 live-stream
Friday 24 January
2 comments
The far-right in Ukraine are acting as the vanguard of a protest movement that is being reported as pro-democracy. The situation on the ground is not as simple as pro-EU and trade versus pro-Putin and Russian hegemony in the region. When US Senator John McCain dined with Ukraine’s opposition leaders in December, he shared a table and later a stage with the leader of the extreme far-right Svoboda party Oleh Tyahnybok. This is Oleh Tyahnybok, he has claimed a "Moscow-Jewish mafia" (...)
read more...
Hugo Chavez is dead (video live)
Wednesday 6 March
by : Collective BELLACIAO
1 comment
President Hugo Chavez companeros venezueliano died after a long battle with cancer.
read more...
International initiative to stop the war in Syria Yes to democracy, no to foreign intervention!
Thursday 13 December
Your support here: http://www.peaceinsyria.org/support.php We, the undersigned, who are part of an international civil society increasingly worried about the awful bloodshed of the Syrian people, are supporting a political initiative based on the results of a fact-finding mission which some of our colleagues undertook to Beirut and Damascus in September 2012. This initiative consists in calling for a delegation of highranking personalities and public figures to go to Syria in order to (...)
read more...
THE KU KLUX KLAN ONCE AGAIN CONTROLS INDIANA
Monday 12 November
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
7 comments
At first glance, the results of America’s 2012 election appear to be a triumph for social, racial, and economic justice and progress in the United States: California voters passed a proposition requiring the rich to shoulder their fair share of the tax burden; Two states, Colorado and Washington, legalized the recreational use of marijuana, while Massachusetts approved the use of marijuana for medical purposes; Washington and two other states, Maine and Maryland, legalized same-sex (...)
read more...
I’VE DECIDED TO "WASTE" MY VOTE
Sunday 28 October
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
In a 2004 episode of Comedy Central’s animated series South Park, an election was held to determine whether the new mascot for the town’s elementary school would be a “giant douche” or a “turd sandwich.” Confronted with these two equally unpalatable choices, one child, Stan Marsh, refused to vote at all, which resulted in his ostracization and subsequent banishment from the town. Although this satirical vulgarity was intended as a commentary on the two (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART IV
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART II PART III If there is one major inconsistency in life, it is that young people who know little more than family, friends and school are suddenly, at the age of eighteen, supposed to decide what they want to do for the rest of their lives. Unfortunately, because of their limited life experiences, the illusions they have about certain occupations do not always comport to the realities. I discovered this the first time I went to college. About a year into my studies, I (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART III
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART II PART IV Disillusioned with the machinations of so-called “traditional” colleges, I became an adjunct instructor at several “for-profit” colleges. Thanks largely to the power and pervasiveness of the Internet, “for-profit” colleges (hereinafter for-profits) have become a growing phenomenon in America. They have also been the subject of much political debate and the focus of a Frontline special entitled College Inc. Unlike traditional (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART II
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART I PART III PART IV Several years ago, a young lady came into the college where I was teaching to inquire about a full-time instructor’s position in the sociology department. She was advised that only adjunct positions were available. Her response was, “No thanks. Once an adjunct, always an adjunct.” Her words still echo in my mind. Even as colleges and universities raise their tuition costs, they are relying more and more on adjunct instructors. Adjuncts are (...)
read more...
HIGHER EDUCATION IN AMERICA: DREAM OR NIGHTMARE? PART I
Friday 28 September
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
PART II PART III PART IV When The Bill of Rights was added to the United States Constitution over two hundred years ago, Americans were blessed with many rights considered to be “fundamental.” One conspicuously missing, however, was the right to an education. This was not surprising given the tenor of the times. America was primarily an agrarian culture, and education, especially higher education, was viewed as a privilege reserved for the children of the rich and (...)
read more...
ONE SOLITARY LIFE, PART TWO
Monday 30 July
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
3 comments
If there is one universal question that haunts all human beings at some point in their lives, it is, “Why do we die?” Death, after all, is the great illogic. It ultimately claims all, the rich and the poor, the mighty and the small, the good and the evil. Death also has the capability to make most human pursuits—such as the quest for wealth, fame and power—vacuous and fleeting. Given this reality, I have often wondered why so many people are still willing to (...)
read more...
HOW MUCH CORRUPTION CAN DEMOCRACY ENDURE?
Thursday 28 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
6 comments
How much corruption can a “democracy” endure before it ceases to be a democracy? If five venal, mendacious, duplicitous, amoral, biased and (dare I say it) satanic Supreme Court “justices”—John Roberts, Samuel Alito, Antonin Scalia, Clarence Thomas and Anthony Kennedy—have their way, America will soon find out. In several previous articles for Pravda.Ru, I have consistently warned how the Supreme Court’s 2010 Citizens United decision is one of the (...)
read more...
DEMOCRACY IN THE HANDS OF IDIOTS, PART TWO
Tuesday 12 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
1 comment
Imagine, if you will, that the United States government passes a law banning advertisers from sponsoring commercials on Rush Limbaugh’s radio show or Rupert Murdoch’s Fox (Faux) “News” Network. On one hand, there would be two decided advantages to this ban: The National IQ would undoubtedly increase several percentage points, and manipulative pseudo-journalists would no longer be able to appeal to the basest instincts in human nature for ratings and profit while (...)
read more...
DEMOCRACY IN THE HANDS OF IDIOTS
Thursday 7 June
by : David R. Hoffman, Pravda.Ru Legal Editor
4 comments
LIVE, from the State that brought you Senator Joseph McCarthy, Wisconsin voters now proudly present, fresh from his recall election victory, Governor Scott Walker! At first glance, it is almost unfathomable that anyone with a modicum of intelligence would have voted to retain Scott Walker as Wisconsin’s governor. This, after all, is a man who openly declared he is trying to destroy the rights of workers through a “divide and conquer” strategy; who received 61% of the (...)
read more...
PEOPLE WITHOUT SOULS
Tuesday 13 March
by : David R. Hoffman, Legal Editor of Pravda.Ru
2 comments
A question I’ve frequently been asked since I began writing for Pravda.Ru in 2003 is, “Why did you become disillusioned with the practice of law?” This question is understandable, particularly since, in most people’s minds, being an attorney is synonymous with wealth and political power. I’ve always been reluctant to answer this question for fear it will discourage conscientious and ethical people from pursuing careers in the legal profession—a (...)
read more...