Congress on Steroids! See No-Nonsense Representatives Get Tough on Witnesses!

In the baseball steroid hearings, we saw aggressive questioning by representatives, but when it involves anything important, like war funding or CIA torture, members of this Congress are nothing but yes-men and neutered pussycats.

If you watched or read about the Congressional hearings yesterday conducted by the House Government Reform Committee, you’d have thought Congress was a real legislature, with bulldog representatives willing to stop at nothing to get at the truth.

There was Rep. Chris Shays (R-Conn.), saying it "boggles the mind," that a witness would provide Congress with false information.

There was Rep. Patrick McHenry, angrily demanding that a witness stop fudging and give a straight-up "yes or no" answer.

Even the Democrats got into the act, with Rep. Elijah E. Cummings (D-Maryland) sounding for all the world like a pugnacious Senate Watergate committee member or like Richard Nixon on the old House Un-American Activities Committee as he demanded of a witness who was refusing to answer a tough question, "Are you taking the Fifth?"

All this toughness, and what was the issue at hand? The latest $82-billion funding request for the war in Iraq? The CIA’s extraordinary rendition kidnapping and torture of terror suspects? The Bush Social Security wrecking scheme? The White House propaganda strategy of producing and sending out fake "news" videos to local TV stations around the country?

No, this was the House hearing into steroid use by baseball players.

The toughness displayed by the representatives on the Government Reform Committee at this silly hearing into an issue that has almost no impact whatsoever on the lives of average Americans contrasted markedly with the way the Senate Armed Services Committee, on the same day, handled its hearing into the CIA’s torture policies since 2001.

There CIA director Porter Goss, a former House member himself, was treated with utmost politeness and decorum, and was allowed to fudge answers, or not answer questions at all.

Goss wasn’t challenged by panel members from either party when he assured his Senate questioners that the CIA uses no "techniques" that would be "in any way against the law" or that would be "considered torture." No one followed up by asking him who was interpreting the law for him (the new Attorney General, Alberto Gonzales, after all, did a bang-up job as White House Counsel, advising the president that the law allowed torture, and the hell with the Geneva Conventions).

When Goss was asked about CIA tactics prior to the present moment, and whether torture might have been used by the agency in the aftermath of 2001, he was allowed to say simply "I am not able to tell you that."

No one pressed him further to ask whether he was, in effect, "taking the Fifth” on the spy agency’s behalf.

With the Republican Party firmly in control of both houses of Congress, and with Democrats selling out on everything from oil drilling on Alaska’s north slope to providing more funds for Bush’s war in Iraq, the one useful thing to come out of the baseball steroid hearings was a reminder of what Congress could be if its members actually took their job even half seriously.

For other stories by Lindorff, please go (at no charge) to
http://www.thiscantbehappening.net/

Also today for laughs in congress- supeona issued to ask Terri Schiavo, a woman who is brain dead to testify before congress. It is difficult to watch this ridiculous waste of time after only two hours were devoted to discussing the very damning conyers report about the fraudulent election. Why doesn’t it occur to congress to investigate something about this abusive, transparently corrupt administration? As Rep. Waxman suggests...

"These subpoenas are a flagrant abuse of power. Congress is turning the Schiavo family’s personal tragedy into a national political farce. The committee has no business inserting itself in the middle of an excruciating private family matter.

These subpoenas are unenforceable. A committee subpoena must be used to gather information. But these subpoenas are dictating the medical care that Ms. Schiavo receives. Congress has no authority to use subpoenas to tell doctors what treatment they can and cannot provide to any individual under their care.

These subpoenas were issued unilaterally by Tom Davis, acting at the request of the Republican leadership. There was no vote and no opportunity to debate the issue in committee. The process was a perversion of democracy."

http://www.commondreams.org/news2005/0318-09.htm

Report Documents Republican Abuse of Power: With This Congress, Democracy is Dead