Home > Scary Police State emerges in UK and USA

Scary Police State emerges in UK and USA

by Open-Publishing - Monday 25 July 2005
56 comments

Edito Police - Repression Attack-Terrorism USA UK

The powers that be are taking us down another notch towards a total
police state. What should cause public outrage is being swept aside as
par for the course in today’s world of terror attacks.

London police just chased down a man and shot him- after they had him detained and he did NOT appear to be a threat.

He was pinned down on the floor and shot through the head five times- is that ok with you?!

If he had a bomb strapped on him, why didn’t the police remove his coat
to prove it? Logically, why would they kill him when they had him
tackled- unless perhaps he saw something, they wanted to shut him up.

Whatever happened to rights, a fair trial? True the UK doesn’t have our
(shredded) Bill of Rights, but surely the Brits aren’t going to give
the police authority be judge, jury and executioner whenever they
desire- right? Stand Up, Britain!

Most revealing is the response of the British government, rather than
condemning such behavior, they are justifying it! They want you to
accept this as policy!

“The man was challenged and refused to obey police instructions,” Sir Ian Blair, the Metropolitan Police commissioner said.

Get used to it- refuse to obey and get shot as a ’terrorist’. Accept police with machine guns and random searches and
gov’t spying- that’s how the world is- that’s why we have to ’stay on the
offensive’ as Bush likes to say.

Who benefits from the attacks?

The London bombings have supposedly give NY cops the right to conduct
UnConstitutional searches. It’s allowed the Diebold ’elected’ Congress
to make the ’Patriot’ Act permanent.

Who benefits from the attacks, indeed!

Americans need to realize that the Framers gave us Freedoms for a
reason- to prevent the rise of a Tyrant. Now we’re giving our Freedoms
away to the village idiot tyrant from hell.

Why are we allowing this Lying, Fraudulent Bush-Cheney neoCon regime to Nazify the USA?

Forum posts

  • Why, you ask?

    Because we are White and Whites must stick together against all non-Whtes.

    It is that simple.

    • Like in the Klu Klux Klan?

    • Surely, that would lead to racial conflict ?
      Are you one of those paople that endorses Bush’s policy of bombing and slaughtering poor brown people round the world ?

    • WHAT!!! Non-whites..Whites have to stick together..What the hell are you talking about! This story went completely over your head..You’re ignorant!!!!

    • You should wonder what is the ultimate goal of the so called free world goverment NWO.They keep saying the terrorists are attacking OUR way of life but mr. blair and that idiot puppet bush dont seem to relize,that over the past few years they infact have been the terrorists in other middle eastern countries with no retaliation until now.

    • your the precise reason our world is spiraling down the funnel of depravity...wake up before it’s too late

    • Hate to break it to you, but you are an African, your mamma was African and your grandpappy was African just like the rest of humanity. It has been established beyond doubt that all human beings descend from a small group of East Africans 170,000 years ago who spread out around the world. I know this must offend your racist sensibilities my wayward African brother or is it sister? Get used to it.

    • IN CASE YOU HAVE’NT LOOKED AROUND LATELY FOOL. THE WHITE MAN IS SCREWING THE WHITE MAN NOW A DAYS. THE WHITE MAN HAS NO RESPECT FOR ANY RACE NOT EVEN HIS OWN.
      FLOYD

    • NOW I UNDERSTAND WHY BUSH AND BLAIR GOT RE-ELECTED! WITH IGNORANT IDIOTS LIKE YOU VOTING ,THESE TWO COUNTRIES ARE IN BIG TROUBLE. IN CASE YOU DO NOT UNDERSTAND WHAT A POLICE STATE IS, LOOK IT UP IDIOT. IT WILL NOT MATTER WHAT THE COLOR OF YOUR SKIN IS FOR THEM TO SHOOT YOU DOWN!

    • this shit is deeper then being white black or what ever wake up man the clan is out we all live on this planet so if we all dont pull together its game over for all then who really wins think about before using white and black do the goverment really care about colors do just green backs (nwo’nwo.nwo.nwo)think about it really hard try smoking a joint help you think calm you down from think everything is all ways about people skin color

    • As described in cuneoform literature, whites in the image of the gods were created by genetic manipulation of the then existing homo erectus species. In that way we all descend from that
      black mama, but with god-genes to make us look like those gods of old.

    • please reevaluate your white supremacist ideals; the planet could do with less ignorence. failing that; you and you KKK buddies should hop onto a burning cross and put your godly roots to the test.

    • What happened to, "We are humans" ???

  • "Why, you ask?

    Because we are White and Whites must stick together against all non-Whtes.

    It is that simple."

    What a noble sentiment - and how utterly original. Incidentally, you can replace "White" with any other adjective you like. But, for the sake of argument, let’s keep it the way you wrote it. "Whites aginst all non-Whites" - you should look at world demographics before you proclaim racist holy war - it would be healthier for you to target another group for starters, maybe "Cat-lovers against all non-Cat-lovers"

    • Don’t forget the main message:

      A police state has emerged and is now in full control, with the approval of the majority of the people in the US and UK.

      Nothing is going to stop it because the government have your money and spend it as they wish.

      When you can earn an income as a sercurity officer, and the income is good, what do you care that the policies being pursued are against the ’people.’

      If the ’people’ don’t step out of line.

      If they do what their overlords wish.

      If they keep going to work, keep paying their taxes, and don’t get involved in nasty politics, then they won’t be harmed.

      The police state is here.

      We are paying for it.

      And if you are not from the US or UK?

      it will be coming to your country soon.

    • Bee-U-tiful!! But tell me, do you know of any racist who isn’t dumb? It’s just impossible to be a racist and be intelligent—they’re simply mutually exclusive. The concept of white supremacy is just soooooooooo ironic, ain’t it?

  • As a brazilian I HAVE TO PROTEST ABOUT THIS CRIME, this young brazilian man was a worker in a strange country- he had a dream to get some money before he return to BraZIL, BUT A INCOMPETENT POLICE - equal to that ones police found at underdeveloped countries- in summary- a crime- an execution- a coward execution - 8 shots in the head when the Jean Charles de menezes was at the floor. Here we are protesting as well as some brazilian in LONDON. Bad police, bad blair, bad bush

    • The Brazilians should hunt down the cops and shoot them 9 times in the head....

    • The guy was assassinated cause he saw somthing or had knowledge of somthing electrical.Something that was top secret.He was actually fired at 11 times.He must have known something really hot.No padded jacket,no running and vaulting over the barrier.No warning given just shot by some secret state plain clothes body intent on denying public knowledge of the thruth.All the media news is only a tiny proportion of thruth,they tell us just enough to keep us happy in ignorance.George Orwell was so right in his book 1984.We live in an orwellian society now wether we believe it or not.The proles say that its ok to kill innocent people to stop innocent people being killed by terrorists and its ok to lose our liberty if we want to keep our freedom.

  • In my opinion it’s as simple as this.

    Due to terrorist attacks (be the true source the terrorists or our very governments plotting to take our freedoms quietly) Our nations are slowly taking away freedoms. I’m a proud American Citizen. As an american since childhood I was taught of my many freedoms that were fought for many a year ago. Now, today I feel as if our freedoms are being taken. I don’t think that anybody is trying to "Nazify" our nations or anything of the sort. In opinion, at least in the United States, I believe that many of these new legislations are mainly to protect us as a people. Some freedoms are being taken frivously. I think that although the legislatures and congressional powers who are slowly taking away specific freedoms, who are there to serve us as a people, at heart really are trying to protect us. I think that the best thing for "extremists" as I will call them, should act now if they truly find corruption in our government. I believe It is possible that what is going on in "The House" could have intentions facing either way.

    I believe that London and The UK are making actions far too soon. I believe that all english lawmakers need to calm down and look at everything from an unbiassed view. They need to look at how to protect their nation, as well as protect the freedoms of their citizens.

    As for many other nations in the world that currently suffer from terrorist attacks on a more frequent basis, I haver very few opinions on this matter as I am not very knowledgable of Government in "Third World Nations" and I know very little about terrorist actions in the undeveloped nations. But for what I know, i think that these nations should probably look at their policies, foreign and domestic, as well as how they operate their governments, and how they operate as a nation.

    My appologies if I happened to get off track.

    • what nobody is prepared to talk about is the "latin american" connection. this is why the poor guy had to be arrested with extreme prejudice (have you tried getting hold of a decent electrician these days?). read what dance instructor bruce lait had to say to the queen, as reported by his local cambridge evening news. then compare it with the daily torygraph’s daintily worded "true lie" (that’s very nearly confirmation). cha cha cha!

    • 26 July 2005

      I wish to respond to Mr. Lieberman’s comments. Since I can tell you have given this quite a lot of thought, and choose to use reason rather than react. let me jus ask a question? How is anyone in the USA or UK protected when their rights are taken away?

      In the early days of Nazi Germany, Adolph Hitler pledged to protect the people of Germany. Soon after, the Reichstag was bombed (this was an inside job by the way) and suddenly Germany went from having no enemies to being surrounded by enemies and placed under martial law. This was a tactic known as PRS (Problem - Reaction - Solution). First, a problem is created (the homeland is in peril), next a ’scapegoat’ selected (all because of those ____!). Finally a solution (you need us to protect you, but to do that we have to take your rights away!) is presented. Now see if that doesn’t sound somewhat familiar?

      Unfortunately the American ideals many of us were raised with do not apply now, because the country was taken from us, and we let it happen. It is most important to fight to keep the remaining freedoms we have. We are not protected if those rights are given up, quite the contrary. It seems that ’Nazification’ has come to our countries regardless, but do we recognize it?

    • SCOTT..... YOU DONT GET IT, YOU JUST DONT GET IT. WAKE UP AMERIKA! WAKE UP! Land of the POLICED! AND HOME of the SLAVE! Sincerly terrorist (little cave dwelling Camel jockies that can take over major intelligent agency and through them for a loop. Im sure glad im not being fooled. This shit isnt that hard to figure out .

  • It’s not a police-state, it’s a war zone.

    This unfortunate death is the predictable result of fighting an enemy that purposefully blends in with the civilian population. Civilized countries put their soldiers in uniforms so that they can be identified as combatants instead of as civilians (and afforded Geneva Convention protections). Jihadists want to kill as many Western civilians as possible, so they hide among our civilian population. By looking at how they select their targets, anyone can see that they have no respect for the lives of civilian non-combatants.

    The responsibility for this man’s death lies almost completely with the bombers. Because of this accident, London law enforcement may hesitate in the future, giving a suicide bomber the split-second he needs to kill himself, the police, and scores of civilians.

    • Wake up & smell the coffee - who benefits ? (it sure ain’t the moslems) al-cia-duh even
      existing is a complete joke to anyone left with a brain to think. As with 911 the official
      lies do not stand up to scrutiny. As with Madrid the bombs were placed UNDER the trains
      (floors pushed up - simple physics) http://www.faulkingtruth.com/Articles/Commentary/1040.html
      http://www.prisonplanet.com/archives/london/index.htm

    • How thick is your skull ? ?
      The attacks are full of anomalies 9/11,Spain ,7/7 and more in Iraq itself What is happening is WE ARE ATTAQCKED BY THE PEOPLE IN POWER. They have the west they want the EAST in their march to full control.The use of fear is an old tric , because people in fear accept to give away freedom for security .

      There probably never was suicide bombers It’s easy for a secret service team to kidnap and kill 4 guys and then claim they did the attack ! David icke ,or cassiopeae, whatreallyhappened ,sites are just 3, the net is full of good explanations.

      One important thing some here dont get (yet) is our govenments( west) are servant of the multinationals and banks which belong to a small dominant group.That "elite"wants to stay at the top of the pyramide they will bribe or kill anybody(our politicians) trying to change the situation. they are the one that profite from WARS. this time they have decided to make a permanente one (without a defined enemy). to make you believe it ,they just have to blow a few bombs here and there periodicaly with a bonus to take a bit of our freedom away each time. SORRY, it hurt to find the truth !

    • "who benefits?" You assume that people are rational. They aren’t.

    • You suggest a conspiracy, but there is no underlying factual basis to support it. You’re trying to pound reality into a new shape to fit your world view.

    • I ask you to look on prisonplanet.tv at a documentary called MARTIAL LAW 911 rise of the police state this should put anyone with who thinks al qaeda committed 911 on the right track.

    • Oh, Lord, I hope you were joking. I looked at the site. It speaks of “dark empire . . . Fourth Reich . . . terrifying secret . . . darkest sanctum of the secret society that controls . . .” If it weren’t being taken seriously, it’d be hilarious. What, you couldn’t link to Timmy McVeigh’s favorite, the Turner Diaries? Did the 1990’s right-wing militias that were afraid that 100,000 Belgian soldiers would issue forth from salt mines in the Midwest and impose a New World Order migrate over to the far left and set up shop on this web site?

      How did paranoid loons on prisonplanet.tv stumble upon the Dark Secret of our times? What are the Imperial Stormtroopers you fear doing letting such a site exist, much less letting its operators make money off of it?

      For the benefit of those of you who are not Americans, please take my word for it—outside of big cities and airports, there has been no—zero—change in day-to-day life, much less the imposition of a “police state.”

      We now return to our regularly-scheduled fear and loathing here on Bellaciao, the site that deleted an article I posted two days ago from the (Australian) Age, no doubt because it deviated from the Bellaciao Party Line.

    • Seriously if you give time to watch the documentarys,you will be presentd with the evidence from people in goverments america and europe.From firefighters that were there on sep. 11 2001,are you going to dismiss their accounts as madness also.Its no wonder the worlds going the way it is.

    • You’re right—of course! But damn, how the hell do you pound that into the heads of people. I mean, it’s such a no-brainer. I can’t believe how so many people delude themselves. But we all know why that is. They get their propaganda fed to them in healthy doses DAILY and being great Americans they CONSUME with ignorant gusto. Ya wanna laugh at so many of them, but unfortunately, they exist in such large numbers that their dumbness is pulling us closer and closer to Armegeddon—and somehow that just ain’t all that funny.

    • As far as the police wether armed or not are concerned, extreme caution should be exercised
      in relation to thought word or deed when dealing with them on any level.
      Its not about conspiracy theorys or extremism, fanatasism or even anarchism, it is simply an accepted misconception that they are trustworthy,rightious guardians of all things vulnerable and
      that they are on yourside.
      There is no innocence clause anymore,if they suspect you have committed one of the mass of everyday things we do but that have been criminalised or any of the old ones,their actions will be of the taking guilt for granted kind—therefore justifying the disgusting way in which they behave
      towards our citizens often when participating in protests that are written in as lawfull in the big black book of unom.

      In the 70s you would be hard pushed to name an uncorrupted member of drugs or vice whatever
      what they did to them is beffiting hypocryts of their breed they put them in their own chains
      all except for the larger fish in the lake.

      This and much more is responsible for the police and surveilance state system thats choked the life out of any civil or human rights that were ours from birth and there to prevent the state of interference now upon us.

      cheers stinky

    • Dude! dont tell me that your buying this crap comming from the news and our White House Wacos. You might want to do more than watch dumb reality shows that warp your mind, Reality shows for the most part train you to speak & Act like a good social slave and accept living in communs. because that exactly what they want. they want you to be an over sexed mezmerized sports junkie that is in debt while they take over the world. we might have the remote control for our TV but its the TV that remotley controls US. IM OUT!

  • Apparently he was shot not five times as your article states. It was EIGHT times. Also, the police were not in uniform but plain clothes.

    • This was not an ’inside job’. Don’t get me wrong governments are not beyond state terrorism, far from it. But this is a result of the state terrorism inflicted upon Palestinians, that US and UK encourage, Chechnya, Afghanistan and Iraq. I know the depth of feeling some Pakistanis and other Muslims feel. And, yes the government will use recent events to impose Draconian legislation and erosion of our rights.
      Waste of energy going down the conspiracy road though, and to cite David Icke ? ’ckin’ ell !

  • this is entirley outrageous. This will not be the end of it. Head for the hills!!!

  • Spot on ...and we need many more Jewish people to speak out against this, as well as gentiles and Muslims. More Jewish people need to speak out about the whole "Neo-con" agenda. Le Chaim.

  • OK most sane people see the fascism rising. Problem is, everyone likes to talk about it, nobody seems to have a clue what to DO about it. Sitting on the ’net discussing it and throwing endless arguments and "I told you so" around passes the time, maybe makes a few more of the Pod People think, but does nothing to stop the fascists at all. They rely on this apathy in fact. I challenge everyone to take their opinions and actually make a difference with them, in the real world. The revolution begins at home, right now.

    • This disguised police state will continue until we are under a total police state, or what I like to call Nazi rule because that’s what it really is. Then when everyone has finally had enough Nazi rule by governments federal, state, and local, and everyone is totally fed up with the totally out of control and unreasonable police antics, we will have a civil war. And the ones to blame will be the liers-politicians,
      government,and police. I hope I don’t live to see it, but it will happen if things keep going the way they are now.

  • RELATED STORY:

    "Blair also suggested expanding laws to make it easier to crack down on people who advocate extremist views on the Internet or through bookstores."
    http://www.usatoday.com/news/world/...

    There you have it- many of the people on this thread are espousing ’extremist views’ - like those in power are the ones benefitting from these ’terrorist’ attacks. I suppose anyone buying George Orwell’s 1984 is also an ’extremist’.

    Accept the official line or you’ll get cracked down on.

    • Yes, SS recruiters weren’t allowed to operate in London in 1942, either, the poor little devils . . .

  • Why did he run ? Did he have anything to hide ? Why did he not stop and put his hands up ? He ran, and ran and ran why, why ? Now we are trying to pontificate and pass judgement on how the police should have handled the situation. Please gentlemen, if the police stops you to interrogate you ,don’t run, don’t try to "escape" or avoid the moment, unless, of course, you have something to conceal or be fearful about ; in which case you ,and not the police, should bear the unforseen consequences, fatal or otherwise, of such a foolhardy behaviour. The police have a job to do, help them to do their job, don’t complicate matters by sprinting away ,a la Jesse Owens, from them when asked to stop.

    • Lets put this into context...The official story is that he was followed from his home by these special ops police who were in plain clothes. And of course they had guns...
      So : if 2 guys with guns, in plain clothes, ie not identifiable AS police were following you, I think most people would run under those circumstances. How about a knock at the door, by uniformed Police Constables, "Hello Sir, we would like you to assist us in our investigation..."?

      Now let’s see what John Gardner, Oxford University Law Proffessor Of Jurisprudence has to say about the matter;

      "Here are some other important things to remember in thinking about the police actions of 22 July:

      (1) There is no general legal duty to assist the police or to obey police instructions. Rice v Connolly [1966] 2 QB 414.

      (2) There are special police powers to arrest and search. But there is no special police licence to injure or kill. If they injure or kill, the police need to rely on the same law as the rest of us.

      (3) The law allows those who use force in prevention of crime to use only necessary and proportionate force. Jack Straw and Sir Ian Blair say that officers are under great pressure. But this is no excuse. In law, as in morality, being under extra pressure gives us no extra latitude for error in judging how much force is proportionate or necessary. R v Clegg [1995] 1 A.C. 482.

      (4) Arguably, the police should be held to higher standards of calm under pressure than the rest of us. Certainly not lower!

      (5) The necessity and proportionality of the police use of force is to be judged on the facts as they believed them to be: R v Williams 78 Cr. App R 276. This does create latitude for factual error. In my view it creates too much latitude. The test should be reasonable belief. The police may be prejudiced like the rest of us, and may treat the fact that someone is dark-skinned as one reason to believe that he is a suicide bomber. But in court this reason should not count.

      (6) It is no defence in law that the killing was authorised by a superior officer. A superior officer who authorises an unlawful killing is an accomplice. R v Clegg [1995] 1 A.C. 482.

      (7) The fact that those involved were police officers is irrelevant to the question of whether to prosecute them. It is a basic requirement of the Rule of Law that, when suspected of crimes, officials are subject to the same policies and procedures as the rest of us.

      (8) Some people say: Blame the terrorists, not the police. But blame is not a zero-sum game. The fact that one is responding to faulty actions doesn’t mean one is incapable of being at fault oneself. We may blame Tony Blair for helping to create the conditions in which bombing appeals to people, without subtracting any blame from the bombers. We may also blame the bombers for creating the conditions in which the police act under pressure, without subtracting blame from the police if they overreact. Everyone is responsible for their own faulty actions, never mind the contribution of others. This is the moral position as well as the position in criminal law.

      (9) Proposed new anti-terrorist offences: The one that has been variously labelled as ’condoning’ or ’glorifying’ or ’indirectly inciting’ terrorism gives cause for concern. It is already an offence to incite another person to commit an act of terrorism (Terrorism Act 2000 s59). In which respects, we may wonder, is the scope of this offence to be extended? The word ’indirect’ suggests that they mean to catch those who incite the s59 inciter. But under general doctrines of English criminal law it is already an offence to incite the s59 inciter. So one suspects some other extension of the existing offence is being cooked up. Is the plan to criminalise the mere defence or endorsement of a terrorist act? If so we are in for trouble. Terrorism in English law is defined to cover all modes of political violence, however trifling. Are academics and commentators no longer to be permitted to defend any political violence? Is Ted Honderich’s Violence for Equality, or Peter Singer’s Democracy and Disobedience, to be put on the banned books list? The only thing protecting these books at the moment is that, in the eyes of the law, an argued endorsement is not an incitement. The thought that the government may be thinking of changing this should send a shiver down the spine of anyone who still has a spine (damn few).

      (10) Lord Hoffman in A v Home Secretary [2005] 2 WLR 87: ’The real threat to the life of the nation ... comes not from terrorism but from laws like these.’ Quite right. Some extra risk of being blown up by fanatics on the way to work is one of the prices we pay for living in a free society. Let’s make sure we keep it that way. "

      I find (1) (9) (10) to be particularly fascinating.

  • Given the circumstances now emerging, from more eye witnesses, of the Brazilian chap shot and killed in London, 8 shots in the head while pinned to the ground, and one shot in the shoulder, is not simply excessive force - it is plain outright disturbing, in that either the officer(s) doing the shooting are deranged, unprofessional cowboys, or, as I’m coming to believe, there’s a lot more to this than meets the eye.

    I’m hard pressed to reckon why police officers would act, not so much precipitously, as with such savage repeat and malice on the trigger finger with someone pinned down and UNCONFIRMED as a threat. Any ideas anyone? What’s happening in the head of a supposedly trained professional(s) who shoots you not once, or twice, but 8 times, and in the head, and with you pinned down?

    If civilians do this it’s recognised as aggravated assault and murder; if a professional does this it’s recognised as either specified by instructions, training , and/or policy; or, that you have an agent who is indicating in no uncertain terms that s/he wants to ’get off the "reservation" really, really soon’ (or has already done so). If the former we are left with the earlier question, namely, what kind of professional training gives rise to 8 head shots while being pinned down?; if the latter we’ll probably never know.

    Remember, the context of this question is that it’s now been confirmed that the dead gentleman, rather than as previously claimed in and through the media by the Police, was

    (a) NOT wearing a heavy coat;

    (b) DID have and use a legitimate TravelCard to access the underground (and did therefore not fly down the stairs and leap over the turnstile as alleged);

    (c) WAS actually followed from flats under observation, onto a crowded bus, and into the underground station (keep in mind the official line is that he was suspected of being a bomber which was why they let him (totally incompetently if so) get on a crowded bus!!?!!; and not only approach but then enter an underground station!!!??!!! which just doesn’t ring true in any set of chimes I know);

    (d) Was pursued by PLAIN clothes policemen with guns in their hands. (No one I know, innocent or otherwise, after making such an observation, is going to calmy wait the arrival of such a storming horde on the basis that they just might be ’real’ UK policemen (without their uniforms) interested in asking my opinion on a matter I might assist them with.

    (e) etc. (there’s a lot more, some of which is covered in other comments), The question I really want to ask is this: what running-amok set of cowboys did this to this guy? How do, supposedly, well trained UK police professionals not know when dead is dead? (In the UK not every police officer gets to just pick up a gun and start firing).

  • We have a witch hunt people! 1. Make people scared. 2. Chase them. 3. If they run, their guilty, Shoot ’em!
    Do we really want to live like this? Spread a little love!!!!!

  • Suicide bombers that run away????? strange think about it.

    Yes they can now shoot who the hell they like, its guilt by association and that will get you shot now over here in the UK, or in this poor fellow’s case just running for a train.

    It was out and out murder and they got away with it and they will get away with the next one too.

    Lets face it folks our two countries have just slaughtered thousands of civilians(most women and children) in Afganistan and Iraq and one f-ing Brazilian is a drop in the ocean so who gives a shit? maybe you will when next time when it’s your son that get’s blown away.

    Democracy what a big f-ing joke.

    Labour = Capitalism
    Liberal = Capitalism
    Conservative = Capitalism

    So now let me see what can I vote for? Oh yes Capitalism now that’s what I call democracy.

    I could hope that one day a comunist party could be a real electorial alternative but I cant see the super rich giving away their lifestyle for Comunism just because it was voted for in a democracy can you?

    They will have the Army out in the streets before you can say count my ballot so dont think for a moment you live in a democracy your only allowed the vote because you can only vote for one of the above and the moment it looks like a comunist victory could even be remotly possible your rights to a vote will go along with what little freedom you have left.

    SO THINK PEOPLE...THINK

  • OK guys we have seemed to have gotton all off track here. want the facts and the truth do this please go to www.floydswebdesign.net then click on our design galley, when there click on the drop down box and click real news.com. see whats really going on in the world.
    PEACE ITS NOT

    • It seems in place to track every security officer that comes to Brazil and hunt him down in retaliation. Anyhow, I don´t think it´ll show in the press.

  • Seems to me it is not a fight between the "whites" and "blacks", or any other color for that matter, but rather a struggle between those who think they still have it all allied with those who want it all against those who just want a safe future for their children. Reminds me of a story about leading sheep to the slaughter.

  • I’VE HEARD SO MANY STORIES ABOUT LONDON BOMBINGS I DONT READ EM ANYMORE........SAME
    WITH N.Y.’S 9-11..........

    POLICE STATE; YOU PEOPLE IN ENGLAND HAVENT SEEN ANYTHING YET...HERE IN USA, POLICE
    ARE HANDCUFFING ""5 YEAR OLD CHILDREN"" AND TAKING THEM TO JAIL,THIS REALLY HAPPENED.

    THIS IS THE WORLD TODAY.....BUSH AND BLAIR HAVE GOTTEN US INTO.AND NOW EVERY DAY WE HEAR MORE ABOUT ’IRAN’ SO IF IRAN GETS ATTACKED,WERE REALLY INTO WWIII.

    THE TROUBLE IS,THAT ALL WORLD GOVERNMENTS LIE TO THE PEOPLE.

    JOHANN DOHMANN

  • people this shit is not all ways about color of people skin it color of money the goverment is putting us on a path to hell turning us as humans against each other to stay face on policing us when ever its time to bring more police in or arm there is terror happening is the new world order way devide and conquer

    • That was nothing short of an assasination. This is how they work it. Strike fear into the hearts of masses, Pass new laws that mean they can get away with it. This means anyone could be next.. again more fear. Fear is what feeds the beast. Dont fear but dont be silent either. We are waking up but We must wake others. Learn all you can, pass it on! The Truth will set us free.

    • look the police have to shoot someone after all if they dont whats the point of them having guns!

  • It is obvious that the vehemence with which the shooting was carried out was that to be expected of a hit man, not a British police officer.

    A hit man would receive and only obey orders from his paymaster, which was obviously not the commanding officer at the time.

    If you consider the event, public outcry, and outcome so far, parties interested could be those who want more violent state control to be backed by the public (as it seems to be by Londoners now) and civil libertarians. Very clever.

    I challenge the Met Police to produce all their records of cases where civilians have been shot in error, and show one where such a number of shots has been fired at such close range.

  • http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/cornwall/4177854.stm

    describes another incident of British police shooting someone. Note the one shot, not eight.