Home > This is global warming, says environmental chief

This is global warming, says environmental chief

by Open-Publishing - Saturday 24 September 2005
9 comments

Catastrophes Environment USA

As Hurricane Rita threatens devastation, scientist blames climate change

By Michael McCarthy, Environment Editor

Super-powerful hurricanes now hitting the United States are the "smoking gun" of global warming, one of Britain’s leading scientists believes.

The growing violence of storms such as Katrina, which wrecked New Orleans, and Rita, now threatening Texas, is very probably caused by climate change, said Sir John Lawton, chairman of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. Hurricanes were getting more intense, just as computer models predicted they would, because of the rising temperature of the sea, he said. "The increased intensity of these kinds of extreme storms is very likely to be due to global warming."

In a series of outspoken comments - a thinly veiled attack on the Bush administration, Sir John hit out at neoconservatives in the US who still deny the reality of climate change.

Referring to the arrival of Hurricane Rita he said: "If this makes the climate loonies in the States realise we’ve got a problem, some good will come out of a truly awful situation." As he spoke, more than a million people were fleeing north away from the coast of Texas as Rita, one of the most intense storms on record, roared through the Gulf of Mexico. It will probably make landfall tonight or early tomorrow near Houston, America’s fourth largest city and the centre of its oil industry. Highways leading inland from Houston were clogged with traffic for up to 100 miles north.

There are real fears that Houston could suffer as badly from Rita just as New Orleans suffered from Hurricane Katrina less than a month ago.

Asked what conclusion the Bush administration should draw from two hurricanes of such high intensity hitting the US in quick succession, Sir John said: "If what looks like is going to be a horrible mess causes the extreme sceptics about climate change in the US to reconsider their opinion, that would be an extremely valuable outcome."

Asked about characterising them as "loonies", he said: "There are a group of people in various parts of the world ... who simply don’t want to accept human activities can change climate and are changing the climate."

"I’d liken them to the people who denied that smoking causes lung cancer."

With his comments, Sir John becomes the third of the leaders of Britain’s scientific establishment to attack the US over the Bush government’s determination to cast doubt on global warming as a real phenomenon.

Sir John’s comments follow and support recent research, much of it from America itself, showing that hurricanes are getting more violent and suggesting climate change is the cause.

A paper by US researchers, last week in the US journal Science, showed that storms of the intensity of Hurricane Katrina have become almost twice as common in the past 35 years.

Although the overall frequency of tropical storms worldwide has remained broadly level since 1970, the number of extreme category 4 and 5 events has sharply risen. In the 1970s, there was an average of about 10 category 4 and 5 hurricanes per year but, since 1990, they have nearly doubled to an average of about 18 a year. During the same period, sea surface temperatures, among the key drivers of hurricane intensity, have increased by an average of 0.5C (0.9F).

Sir John said: "Increasingly it looks like a smoking gun. It’s a fair conclusion to draw that global warming, caused to a substantial extent by people, is driving increased sea surface temperatures and increasing the violence of hurricanes."

Super-powerful hurricanes now hitting the United States are the "smoking gun" of global warming, one of Britain’s leading scientists believes.

The growing violence of storms such as Katrina, which wrecked New Orleans, and Rita, now threatening Texas, is very probably caused by climate change, said Sir John Lawton, chairman of the Royal Commission on Environmental Pollution. Hurricanes were getting more intense, just as computer models predicted they would, because of the rising temperature of the sea, he said. "The increased intensity of these kinds of extreme storms is very likely to be due to global warming."

In a series of outspoken comments - a thinly veiled attack on the Bush administration, Sir John hit out at neoconservatives in the US who still deny the reality of climate change.

Referring to the arrival of Hurricane Rita he said: "If this makes the climate loonies in the States realise we’ve got a problem, some good will come out of a truly awful situation." As he spoke, more than a million people were fleeing north away from the coast of Texas as Rita, one of the most intense storms on record, roared through the Gulf of Mexico. It will probably make landfall tonight or early tomorrow near Houston, America’s fourth largest city and the centre of its oil industry. Highways leading inland from Houston were clogged with traffic for up to 100 miles north.

There are real fears that Houston could suffer as badly from Rita just as New Orleans suffered from Hurricane Katrina less than a month ago.

Asked what conclusion the Bush administration should draw from two hurricanes of such high intensity hitting the US in quick succession, Sir John said: "If what looks like is going to be a horrible mess causes the extreme sceptics about climate change in the US to reconsider their opinion, that would be an extremely valuable outcome."

Asked about characterising them as "loonies", he said: "There are a group of people in various parts of the world ... who simply don’t want to accept human activities can change climate and are changing the climate."

"I’d liken them to the people who denied that smoking causes lung cancer."

With his comments, Sir John becomes the third of the leaders of Britain’s scientific establishment to attack the US over the Bush government’s determination to cast doubt on global warming as a real phenomenon.

Sir John’s comments follow and support recent research, much of it from America itself, showing that hurricanes are getting more violent and suggesting climate change is the cause.

A paper by US researchers, last week in the US journal Science, showed that storms of the intensity of Hurricane Katrina have become almost twice as common in the past 35 years.

Although the overall frequency of tropical storms worldwide has remained broadly level since 1970, the number of extreme category 4 and 5 events has sharply risen. In the 1970s, there was an average of about 10 category 4 and 5 hurricanes per year but, since 1990, they have nearly doubled to an average of about 18 a year. During the same period, sea surface temperatures, among the key drivers of hurricane intensity, have increased by an average of 0.5C (0.9F).

Sir John said: "Increasingly it looks like a smoking gun. It’s a fair conclusion to draw that global warming, caused to a substantial extent by people, is driving increased sea surface temperatures and increasing the violence of hurricanes."

http://news.independent.co.uk/world/americas/article314510.ece

Forum posts

  • Is Sir John postulating that climate change is proof of global warming? If so, he is not a very good scientist. No scientist knows why the climate changes, if we did we would be able to predict the weather but we do a very poor job.

    • From a scientific point of view you, might check out a brief article, ’in the different and interesting ways to frame the question on Storms and Climate change’.
      A volunteer site run by scientist specialising in this area:
      http://www.realclimate.org/index.php.?p=180#comments
      cheers, jt

    • Dream you American SUV dream, it will not last very long!

      Americans are the nerds of the earth! We should change the word for stupid in american, there is no difference.

      Oh, did you have your engergy assault today? Hi di dei...

    • Thank you very much for the website, I found the discussion to be fairly balanced regarding the connection between hurricanes and global warming. The one thing that is troubling is the assumption that global warming is the fault of humans. Again, that has not been conclusively proven.

    • Scientists seldom offer conclusive proof about anything, that’s the history and nature of their inquires, as I understand them.
      cheers, jt

    • Not true. They can put forth hypothesis and their conclusions can come close the answer or it is proved true. Other scientists will also try the experiments to see if it can be replicated. The more it can be replicated the more it becomes conclusive. When it comes to global warming there haven’t been any experiments that are conclusive.

    • With highly politicized topics I’ve observed scientists obfuscate like the best of lawyers.
      (I’m definitely familiar with the standard duplicate it here- there concept)
      Some friends in University research, self censor or take other measures to maintain Corporate funding for their work, confine, narrow or obscure particular paths of inquiry.
      The book ’Brighter than a Thousand Suns:The Moral and Political History of The Atomic Scientists, gave me an intimate look into science, morality, and objectivity. (read over 40 years ago)
      I have watched in my own country government scientists (research monies primarily paid for by industry) who have disclosed findings contrary to ’accepted opinion’, being fired. I have followed closely the depleted uranium health hazard debates, here there is more of ’a fog of science’ going on, then in war or in Iraq.
      Until powerful whistle-blower protection becomes enshrined into law, or more courageous individuals speak out, like the well know Canadian geneticist David Suzuki, the reputation of science and scientists will be suspect and questioned, by plebeians like me.
      cheers, jt

    • Scientists are not only manipulated on the corporate side, but they are also manipulated by NGOs that want to promote their POV. Those scientists who ally themselves with certain causes are also not any better for they have lost their objectivity.

    • Is it Particle or Quantum physics that now questions the very basis of objectivity.?
      I’ll have to get back to some of my earlier readings but it seems that subjectivity can influence the manner in which waves and particles may be manipulated by the observer.
      Do you know what I’m referring to.?
      I have a good memory but its short.?
      Objectivity is always a great challenge or an Illusion of course, since concepts differ depending on ones choice of models or methodology eg the East or the Western ones.
      Discouraging to think that he who pays the piper still calls the tune...whether motivated by profit, providence, or POV’s in between.
      To those ’objective scientist’ where ever they may be I hope they find the middle way in whatever their particular methodology.
      cheers, jt