Home > ADL’s New ’Hate Bill’ The Death Knell For Talk Radio

ADL’s New ’Hate Bill’ The Death Knell For Talk Radio

by Open-Publishing - Wednesday 28 September 2005
2 comments

Discriminations-Minorit. Justice Democracy Religions-Beliefs USA

By Rev. Ted Pike
6-29-5

The Anti-Defamation League’s new, tougher hate bill, "The Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2005," HR 2662, if passed, will very soon end FREE SPEECH and FREE SPEECH TALK RADIO. The ADL, through similar legislation, has already ended free speech in Canada. It wants to do the same in America.

Here’s a summary of how this bill would make law.

HR 2662 intends to enforce nation-wide the working ADL/federal definition that ’hate’ equals bias against federally-protected groups. Particularly against:

Homosexuals. Any specific public criticism of homosexuals will eventually be considered a hate crime, just as it already has been for eleven Christians under the ADL’s Pennsylvania hate crime law on Oct. 10, 2004.

Transvestites. Female impersonators, and persons with confused or altered gender, will gain special federal protection against bias-motivated threat. This includes transvestites who are threatened for sexist reasons by males who perceive them as really being women. Such men will be prosecuted as ’hate criminals’ against women, even though the ’woman’ they were biased against was actually a man!

Women. Any woman who claims, "The last time I had sex with him, he used a sexist word against me. He raped me!" can press charges for a ’hate crime’ of rape. Punishment will be triple the usual penalty - about 30 years in prison.

Jews. B’nai B’rith, a Jewish religious organization, invented ’hate laws’ to make public criticism of homosexuality a ’hate crime.’ Yet this is only a step toward B’nai B’rith’s REAL objective: making public criticism of Jews, matters Jewish, and the State of Israel, a hate crime.

HR 2662 intends to give the same special federal protection to Jews as to homosexuals, providing a green light for corrupt Jewish leaders to intensify their domination of the media, Congress, and the Mideast. Hate laws will eventually empower Jewish leadership to imprison those who criticize them, be they Jews or Gentiles.

HR 2662 will invite pedophiles, witches, warlocks, Satanists and even ’sinners’ to acquire special federal protection from anyone who criticizes them, including pastors. Witches and warlocks in England are, today, lobbying hard for inclusion under Britain,s ADL hate law.

If passed, HR 2662 will provide immediate special FBI, Justice Department and local police assistance to protected groups that claim to have been offended. On the slightest evidence of bias, the police will descend [as the world saw happen last October in Philadelphia] upon Christians, pastors, talk show hosts and radio station managers, indicting them with trumped-up ’hate crime.’ charges and exorbitant penalties.

FEDERAL TAKEOVER OF LOCAL LAW ENFORCEMENT

A huge barrier to establishment of a federal hate bureaucracy has been the sovereign right of states to enforce the law as they see fit. Heretofore, the federal government has had to prove that such abuses as jury tampering, voter fraud, and slavery existed in states before it could meddle in state law enforcement. HR 2662 would legitimize as law several devious strategies to break down all barriers to federal intrusion.

HR 2662 asserts that if a violent bias crime within a state in any way affects interstate commerce, the federal government has the right to invade state law enforcement. This means that, if a homosexual has been called a ’faggot’ and been threatened to have his butt kicked by a gas station attendant, and as a result does not patronize that gas station, whose products have come from across the state line, the federal government can intervene. Or if the homosexual buys a Greyhound ticket (vehicle of interstate commerce) to re-settle in San Francisco as a result of such threatened ’violence,’ the federal government has a green light to take over state hate crime law enforcement in that state. Sec. 7(2)(B), Sec. 2(5-8).

HR 2662 asserts that bias-motivated violence in states is a ’relic’ of slavery. This bill contends that the presence of bias-motivated violent crime within a state is proof that slavery still exists in that state. This provides the same justification for intervention that the federal government had in putting down slavery during the Civil War! Sec. 2(10,11).

Under HR 2662, the government can take over local law enforcement if
1. states do not have hate laws; Sec. B (b)(2A)
2. states are not enforcing state and federal hate laws as zealously as the federal government wishes; Sec.B (b)(2A)
3. states do not produce the kind of verdicts in hate crimes trials that the federal government wants. Sec. B (b)(2D)

VIOLATING THE CONSTITUTION

HR 2662 is in flat violation of the 14th Amendment to the Constitution, which prohibits government from favoring any particular group.

HR 2662 will give ADL complete control of the federal anti-hate agenda. Very quickly, via enabling legislation and judicial precedent, any pretext of respect for the rights of Christians or dissenters will dissolve. This has already happened under the ADL anti-hate law in Canada, England, Ireland, Sweden, France, Italy, Australia, New Zealand, and under Pennsylvania’s ADL hate law in Philadelphia on Oct. 10th.

All criticism of protected groups via politically incorrect terms, such as ’homosexual’ or
’sodomite,’ will become hate crime, just as it is under the British ADL hate law.

A huge number of legal precedents will continuously widen hate law jurisdiction.

Courts will quickly become clogged with federal indictments.

Staggering backlogs of unresolved cases, will make the federal hate law, like Roe vs. Wade, virtually impossible to repeal.

FCC restrictions will soon descend on talk show hosts with lists of unapproved topics. Talk show hosts will be fined or imprisoned and stations will lose their broadcast licenses, just as in Canada today, if they violate those restrictions.

TALK RADIO - ON THE ENDANGERED LIST

Talk show hosts - Do you get the picture? If HR 2662 passes, your occupation as a free speech talk show host will go the way of Diplodocus.

You have two main options. First, wait and see what happens, fearful of offending a huge religious organization, B’nai B’rith, and their sycophantic yea-sayers, the Israel-first evangelicals. If you opt for this, you might as well start taking night classes to prepare for another line of work.

Or, you can invite me on your show for a very spirited and persuasive program, thoroughly convincing your audience to help save your occupation by protesting now to Congress.

In Canada on Aug. 28th, ’CHOI FM,’ Quebec City’s most popular talk show station was dissolved by the Canadian government. Its 33 employees were put out of work. Its offence? One of the talk show hosts criticized African dictators who had their children educated in Canadian universities. This was considered a ’hate crime’ against blacks.

If HR 2662 is passed, exactly the same will soon happen to you and your station if you stray to the slightest degree from the new ’politically correct’ FCC guidelines.

May I hear from you soon? My number is (503) 631-3808.

The ADL is lobbying hard for passage of HR 2662 - legislation that will not only end free speech, but free speech talk radio. ADL still has tremendous power in Congress. All it might take is one outrageous hate crime, such as a homosexual being dragged to death behind a pickup, to ignite ADL-assisted national outrage, stampeding Congress into quickly passing HR 2662.

We must lay a foundation of education that will help resist storms of ’anti-hate’ hysteria in the years ahead. The best way to do that is to read the articles against hate laws at www.truthtellers.org and purchase online Rev. Ted Pike’s gripping video documentary, ’Hate Laws: Making Criminals of Christians’ for $24.90.

Show this video everywhere you can, especially in your church.
This video is free to talk show hosts who request it.
TO PROTEST HR 2662, CALL YOUR MEMBER OF CONGRESS
TOLL-FREE: 1-877-762-8762

Rev. Ted Pike, an authority on hate crimes legislation, will help your audience fully understand the threat and vagaries of hate crimes laws. He is available for interview at (503) 631-3808.

http://www.rense.com/general66/adl.htm

Forum posts

  • Would talking about US military actions which obliterated the city of Fallujah be considered a crime of hate or a hate crime.?
    cheers, jt

  • I am a lesbian, and I don’t think I want ANY laws that define what people can and can not say. It is just a short hop from this bill to sedition bills. Sounds like a bunch of b_ll to me.

    In Texas, we have a verbal harassment law, and I called the police one time to come down to a restarant where some homophobic frat boys were calling me names. The policeman was wonderful. He got all of the guys names, DL numbers, and addresses, asked me if I wanted to file charges and should he do the paperwork(I said no, just glad we are having this situation and little discussion so guys like that know they can not call harass folks with defamatory names in public — and they had really, really harassed me for about an hour), then the policeman said, well then look how about I just make a regular report on the incident and give this woman here all of your names and addresses in case you decide to harass her again — that way she will know who her abusers are, and she can call up the police again, and we will definitely arrest you. So don’t do it again. We WILL take you in. And, the policeman said, and I bet this little lesbian has some big dyke friends who probably would be real, real mad if you do it again (I said sarcastically nah, I don’t have any big, mean brutal dyke friends like that, nah . . . that was funny — it scared the frat boys pretty bad — don’t think any of them had ever been confronted by an authority about their bad behavior cause their eyes popped out and they got very, very nervous) I had witnesses, and the policeman was ready to bust those guys. The officer even made them apologize to me in front of all those people in the restaurant and told them to learn some manners. I figured, well, they only called me names, and sticks and stones may hurt me, but words are just words. The policeman hung around to make sure those guys left and were long gone so that I could walk back home safely.

    I imagine every state has harassment laws like that. So, what is the point of some hate bill? Sounds like they are trying to legislate bias not hate. You can’t legislate hate nor love nor what people think. I would rather freedom of speech is completely free. In Texas, you can say any thing about anybody so long as you make it very clear that it your opinion. I would rather a frat boy tell me just what he thinks of me so that I know exactly where I stand and that way I am on guard and will know to defend myself than some guy acting all nice and then jumping me in some dark alley later. Course with all of this free speach down here in Texas, you still have to be a bit careful about slander and libel and all, but not much, so long as you make it clear that it is YOUR OPINION. I could have even made a statement that in my opinion I thought that some frat boys were woman haters . . . so long as I did not go on and on and harang and harass and yell and carry on. One statement that "in MY OPINION some frat boys hate women" would have been just fine legally.

    I prefer that we allow people to express any thing they want to express. It gives us the opportunity to deconstruct what they are saying and to point out the bias and the hate in their statements. It provides for discourse on all of these issues. How are people going to grow if they don’t make verbal nasties that we can point out to them and others around them? A hate bill just provides censorship, and is not the way to solve any kind of hatred.

    And, no I don’t hate frat boys . . . I don’t have time or interest in hating anyone . . . it is waste of energy. I kind of thought the whole incident was a great example for everyone in that restaurant of just what people can and can not do to other people in public. I believe it opened their eyes to the hatred that gays and lesbians DO go through, that it is illegal to harass folks (even gays, blacks, or anyone) like those boys did me, and I think they gained a better opinion of lesbians because I was calm, firm, and reasonable and the frat boys were being real jerks, and maybe, hopefully, the people watching the whole scene questioned any of their own homophobia that they were holding.

    Well, that is the way it went . . . I might have embelished a bit, but that is pretty much how it went. That law sounds unnecessary and like yet another invasion on states rights.

    Now you want to know about a true hate crime — go look at my website: www.noexoticwarfarezone.com

    peace ya’ll,
    Carolyn Williams Palit