Home > Congress Gives the Bushies $50 Billion For War (without even being asked)

Congress Gives the Bushies $50 Billion For War (without even being asked)

by Open-Publishing - Friday 30 September 2005
2 comments

Wars and conflicts Economy-budget International USA

Senate measure would push Iraq, Afghanistan war costs to $400 billion

By Liz Sidoti
The Associated Press

WASHINGTON - The Senate would give President Bush $50 billion more for wars in Iraq and Afghanistan as part of a $440 billion defense-spending measure a panel approved yesterday.

The House already has approved $45 billion more for the wars as part of its $409 billion version of the bill providing money for the Defense Department for the budget year that begins Oct. 1.

Both the Senate and House versions provide for a 3.1 percent pay raise for the military, but the bills differ in other areas. The conflicts must be sorted out before Congress sends the final bill to the president.

Overall, Congress already has given the president about $350 billion for combat and reconstruction in Iraq and Afghanistan and fighting terrorism worldwide since the Sept. 11 attacks, according to the Congressional Research Service. That total includes $82 billion that lawmakers approved in May.
The Bush administration has not yet asked for more war money, but lawmakers are reluctant to wait for a formal request. Costs are certain, given that there’s no end in sight to involvement in Iraq or Afghanistan.

Lawmakers are doling out dollars for the wars even as concerns arise about paying for reconstruction of the hurricane-ravaged Gulf Coast. At the same time, Congress and the president are facing public unease about the direction of the war in Iraq, according to public-opinion polls that show dwindling support for it.

The House spending measure has been finished since June, but the Senate defense-appropriations subcommittee postponed work on the Senate version in hopes that an authorization bill setting defense policy would be voted on first, as is customary.

But that bill is stalled, and subcommittee Chairman Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, said the panel couldn’t wait any longer to approve the spending bill, given that the new budget year is approaching. "We know that 2006 funding will be needed in early November," he said.

Excluding war money, the Senate bill totals $390 billion - about $7 billion less than the $397 billion the president had requested for the Defense Department.

The House bill totals $364 billion, but it is not directly comparable to the Senate version because some items funded in the Senate defense bill were paid for in nondefense bills in the House.

The Senate bill also would:

• Pay for permanent manpower increases in the Army, to 522,400 soldiers, and the Marine Corps, to 178,000 Marines. Lawmakers want to increase active-duty troop levels to take pressure off of National Guard and Reserve troops serving overseas.

• Add $422 million for National Guard and Reserve equipment, some of which is being used - and battered - in the battlefields of Iraq and Afghanistan.

• Include $622.5 million to support additional recruiting and retention incentives at a time when enlistments are lagging.

Copyright © 2005 The Seattle Times Company

Forum posts

  • Americans pay and will pay the price: more and more jobs are being exported. Don’t you ever get it!
    Why d i d y o u vote for the Bush gang.

    • We voted for Bush because he spoke to our fears and ignorance. As a people, we Americans are easily spooked. When we are told that there are other peoples on earth who look different then us — we are spooked. We are a scared nation of peoples who think everyone else is out to kill us and take away our possessions.

      It does not matter whether Bush or Kerry had won or anyone else. The story would have been the same.