Home > ... > Forum 34480

> THE REAL REASON FRIST WANTS TO PROTECT PHARMA

18 February 2006, 20:11

Bravo for this exposure to the truth. There are thousands of us who know these facts are true.

I think a perfect example of COVER-UP is this recent Cheney shooting. Why wouldn’t he come right out and declare the mishap?

Bush & Company (B&C) and great manipulators of the federal agencies and discount any "Good Science". In fact the EPA longstanding head person stepped down when he had to deal with the funny business of concealing information from B&C. It is a known fact that Big Pharma gives 85-90% of their money not to ad’s ...but to doctors. Now, let’s look at the big picture, senators throwing in last minute language to give immunity to Big Pharma. While I do agree many squawked about it, they didn’t appeal it for being down in a decptive way. Instead it’s on the books and we have to live with it. They have the power to OVERRIDE this deal if it was based on DECEPTION. Ms. Dachel points out some facts that are not new, but I guess you have to keep hammering away...and maybe by the 20th time it will sink in.

I understand 25 Senators are trying to fulfill the long-awaited hope of the middle class to poor ...IMPEACH BUSH. Sadly, on 12/30/05 the National Instutite of Mental Health declared autism an EPIDEMIC....did that really resinate with the American’s? News media must also be very manipulated. You only hear of Senator’s Burton and Kennedy trying to advocate change on behalf of the broken families.

I am pretty damn outraged at our elected officials. Unfortunately most have conflicts of interest in earning money off the way the big companies directors make decisions...just like our government.

Three "Moron" years left
Cranston, RI