Home > ... > Forum 7082

> Kerry’s Silence Indicates Complicity with Vote Fraud

28 November 2004, 09:03

Ummm... I think the short answer is no, you are not supposed to be motivated to act on Kerry’s behalf by the contents of this article. The fact is, we were, at least the vast majority, NOT voting FOR Kerry, rather we were voting AGAINST Bush. The point of the article is that Kerry ultimately hijacked that effort. His complicity with the vote fraud, his passivity in even commenting about the widespread allegations and the corresponding actions of the third party candidates who are the heroes of this election, indicate that in fact his intention was to deliver us to the current outcome, i.e. a Bush victory.
Perhaps you will be motivated, however, to support the investigations into alleged voting irregularities, or fraud if you will, for the hope of a true democracy in the future. Perhaps you will be motivated to realize that the two-party system is a facade, and that those who train our attention on a purported divided America are the ones we should NOT be listening to. Just look at the new voter registrations in every state in 2004, what was the largest category? INDEPENDENT! The truth is that many Americans are disillusioned with the current status quo running this country. We should all commit ourselves to giving more attention and credit to the 3rd party candidates. As for myself, I have never belonged to a party, but I am getting very close to wanting to join the Green Party. It makes me proud to see that Cobb, Baradnik, and Nader are reaching accross the illusive party lines to work together. That’s what we need to support as independents. What we should all wake up to is that the mirage that separates us is exactly that. We are deliberately and methodically divided, and therefore conquered! We need to end this fictitious two party system and open it up so that all perspectives have a voice. Isn’t that what democracy is all about?