> Cynthia McKinney censored in congressional record- Is someone afraid of the word IMPEACHMENT?
5 April 2006, 23:15
One of the major problems for reasonable, humane individuals in search of a more enlightened world is that they face the reactive charge that they’re "liberal" and regardless of how logical their argument may be it should, accordingly, be ignored because of their supposed liberal bias. Under the auspices of a liberal bias, believers summarily follow an agenda of supporting "liberal" causes regardless of whether or not they make sense, e.g., the habitual, unconditional charge of racism. Yes there’s racism and it’s propagated against every race, from blacks to Jews, from Hispanics to Slavs, because, unfortunately, there’s a belief in far too many people that their kind is better than all the rest. That’s a human disease, not a white disease, or a Republican disease.
For instance, ask Ms. McKinney, off-the-record, which race is the superior one.
By collectively backing McKinney in this case, the liberal cause is profoundly damaged because of the lack of being objective and fair. Fairness in this case requires that the finger be pointed in the right, or in this case, the left position, directly at Ms. McKinney, who, by the way, has a thyroid condition of some kind - Just look at those bulging eyes! Maybe it’s merely hormonal. But whatever it is, it’s uncalled for and there’s no excuse for it no matter how she’s voted in the past.
Liberals discredit themselves, and appear desperate when they support behavior like hers, which adds fuel to the other side. Republicans are often accused of being attack dogs, and they are, frequently abusing the acceptable limits of civility. Yet likewise, Democrats also have their share of attack dogs when things go wrong, but unfortunately it’s customarily for the defense of their own welfare as in this case, as opposed to justifiable attacks that amount to true progress. Too bad Ms. McKinney has chiefly relied on fringe conspiracy theories to go after Bush. There’s ample evidence on the record to work with; one doesn’t have to invent metaphysical theories to change the course of America’s history. Hopefully her replacement, who won’t arrive soon enough, will remedy that.
One of the major problems for reasonable, humane individuals in search of a more enlightened world is that they face the reactive charge that they’re "liberal" and regardless of how logical their argument may be it should, accordingly, be ignored because of their supposed liberal bias. Under the auspices of a liberal bias, believers summarily follow an agenda of supporting "liberal" causes regardless of whether or not they make sense, e.g., the habitual, unconditional charge of racism. Yes there’s racism and it’s propagated against every race, from blacks to Jews, from Hispanics to Slavs, because, unfortunately, there’s a belief in far too many people that their kind is better than all the rest. That’s a human disease, not a white disease, or a Republican disease.
For instance, ask Ms. McKinney, off-the-record, which race is the superior one.
By collectively backing McKinney in this case, the liberal cause is profoundly damaged because of the lack of being objective and fair. Fairness in this case requires that the finger be pointed in the right, or in this case, the left position, directly at Ms. McKinney, who, by the way, has a thyroid condition of some kind - Just look at those bulging eyes! Maybe it’s merely hormonal. But whatever it is, it’s uncalled for and there’s no excuse for it no matter how she’s voted in the past.
Liberals discredit themselves, and appear desperate when they support behavior like hers, which adds fuel to the other side. Republicans are often accused of being attack dogs, and they are, frequently abusing the acceptable limits of civility. Yet likewise, Democrats also have their share of attack dogs when things go wrong, but unfortunately it’s customarily for the defense of their own welfare as in this case, as opposed to justifiable attacks that amount to true progress. Too bad Ms. McKinney has chiefly relied on fringe conspiracy theories to go after Bush. There’s ample evidence on the record to work with; one doesn’t have to invent metaphysical theories to change the course of America’s history. Hopefully her replacement, who won’t arrive soon enough, will remedy that.